Note
Let be an interval and a partition. We define the variation of a funtion w.r.t. partition as
and the total variation of as the supremum on all partitions
If this quantity is finite, we say that has bounded variation and we denote the set of all bounded variation functions on as . If then we write (notation from Kolmogorov-Fomin).
Example
- The function is continuous on but .
- The function has .
Properties
The set forms a linear space (with sum and scalar multiplication defined in the obbious way), since
- since .
Since iff is a constant function, is a seminorm on this linear space. To get a norm one could define where .
Let .
- If is monotone, then and , since if w.l.o.g. is non-decreasing we can drop the absolute values and get a telescopic sum
- If is Lipschitz with constant then , since
- If then
if we use the mean value theorem
but the supremum on all partitions of is the definition of the Riemann-Darboux intergral of .
- Let , then
since
where we have split the sum such that and .
Let and be two partitions of the intervals and such that and . Since is a partition for
since was arbitrary the claim follows.
This implies, since the total variation is a non-negative quantity, that the function defined as
is monotonic non-decreasing. From this follows a cool decomposition theorem.
Note
Jordan’s decomposition Every bounded variation function in an interval can be written as the difference of two monotonic non-decreasing functions.
Note
\phi = v-f
, wherev(x) = V_a^x[f]
. Letx \leq y
, thenConsider the function
we see that is also monotonic non-decreasing, so can be written as
which is the decomposition we were looking for.
Note
Clearly the decomposition is not unique, since we can add a constant. To obtain a unique decomposition one can fix the value of the first function to zero at point for example.
Tip
We can extend the theorem to unbounded intervals taking the or , of course we need to restrict to bounded monotonic functions.
A consequence of this decomposition is that any bounded variation function has a well defined derivative a.e.
Decomposition of BV functions
Let’s recap what we know about bounded variation functions. Let , since in general
define a new function as this difference
Note that almost everywhere. Then we can decompose as
where is an absolutely continuous function. Then is still a bounded variation function that we can represent using the Jordan decomposition:
where are monotonic non-decreasing functions. We can further decompose and using Jump functions:
where are continuous functions. Putting all piecies togheter we get:
where is called the Jump part of ; is a continuous function known as the cantorian part of , and is the absolutely continuous part of .
For example the Cantor-Vitali function coincides with its cantorian part (this is the reason for its name).
Moral of the story
Since a.e., the only part we can get back from integrating the derivative is the absolutely continuous one.